The Eloquence of Mary Astell

By Christine M. Sutherland
Categories: Social Sciences, Popular Culture, Communication & Media Studies, Gender & Sexuality Studies, Women’s Studies
Publisher: University of Calgary Press
Paperback : 9781552381533, 224 pages, January 2006
Ebook (PDF) : 9781552384596, 224 pages, January 2006

Table of contents

Acknowledgements
Introudction

Part I: Mary Astell?s Context

1. The Problem of Ethos
2. Mary Astell and the Problem of Ethos

Part II: Mary Astell?s Rhetorical Practice

3. Letters Concerning the Love of God
4. A Serious Proposal to the Ladies, Part I
5. A Serious Proposal to the Ladies, Part II
6. Some Reflections Upon Marriage
7. The Christian Religion
8. Political Pamphlets

Part III: Mary Astell?s Rhetorical Theory

8. Rhetorical Theory I
9. Rhetorical Theory II

Conclusions
Appendix A
Appendix B
Bibliography
Notes
Index

Description

The Eloquence of Mary Astell makes an important contribution to the knowledge and understanding of the important role that women, and one woman in particular, played in the history of rhetoric. Mary Astell (1666-1731) was an unusually perceptive thinker and writer during the time of the Enlightenment. Here, author Christine Sutherland explores her importance as a rhetorician, an area that has, until recently, received little attention. Astell was widely known and respected during her own time, but her influence and reputation receded in the years after her death. Her importance as an Enlightenment thinker is becoming more and more recognized, however. As a skilled theorist and practitioner of rhetoric, Astell wrote extensively on education, philosophy, politics, religion, and the status of women. She showed that it was possible for a woman to move from the semi-private form of rhetoric represented by conversation and letters into full public participation in philosophical and political debate.

Reviews

 

Spare and elegant . . . With admirable dexterity and economy, Sutherland sets out women's loss of ideological status in the Reformation and Renaissance.

—Regina Janes, University of Toronto Quarterly