Feminized Justice

The Toronto Women’s Court, 1913-34

By Amanda Glasbeek
Categories: Law & Legal Studies, History, Canadian History, Legal History, Gender & Sexuality Studies, Women’s Studies
Series: Law and Society
Publisher: UBC Press
Hardcover : 9780774817110, 240 pages, November 2009
Paperback : 9780774817127, 240 pages, July 2010
Ebook (PDF) : 9780774817134, 240 pages, July 2010
Ebook (EPUB) : 9780774859097, 240 pages, July 2010

Table of contents

Introduction

1 The Toronto Women’s Police Court as an Institution

2 Feminism, Moral Equality, and the Criminal Law: The Women’s Court as Feminized Justice

3 “The badness of their badness when they’re bad”: Women, Crime, and the Court

4 “What chance is there for a girl?” Vagrancy and Theft Charges in the Women’s Court

5 “Up again, Jenny?” Repeat Offenders in the Women’s Court

6 “Can her justice be just?” Margaret Patterson, Male Critics, and Female Criminals, 1922–34

Conclusion

Notes

Bibliography

Index

An engrossing history of the trials and tribulations of the Toronto Women’s Police Court – Canada’s first experiment with feminized justice.

Description

In 1913, Toronto launched Canada’s first woman’s police court. The court was run by and for women, but was it a great achievement? This multifaceted portrait of the cases, defendants, and officials that graced its halls reveals a fundamental contradiction at the experiment’s core: the Toronto Women’s Police Court was both a site for feminist adaptations of justice and a court empowered to punish women. Reconstructed from case files and newspaper accounts, this engrossing portrait of the trials and tribulations that accompanied an early experiment in feminized justice sheds new light on maternal feminist politics, women and crime, and the role of resistance, agency, and experience in the criminal justice system.

Reviews

Glassbeek's book is an important addition to feminist colloquy as well as feminist inquiry...[a] comprehensive and insightful explanation of how and why a path paved with good intentions became a dead end.

- Judith A. Baer, Texas A&M University